Safety And Efficacy of Clonidine for Acute Hypertensive Urgency in an Older and Hospitalized Population.

Objective To describe the use of clonidine in hospitalized older people for acute management of hypertension. Methods This was an observational retrospective cross-sectional chart review study. Older people hospitalized between November 2017 and November 2018, with a one-time or as-needed clonidine order were eligible, and a random sample of these patients were included. Hospitalized patients could be admitted for hypertensive urgency or emergency, or for other reasons. Results During the 12-month study period, 546 charts were identified as having at least one clonidine prescription, 248 were screened and 205 were included. The mean age was 75 years of age ± 8 years of age and men made up 53% (n = 109) of the group. One hundred fifty-one patients (74%) received at least one dose of clonidine and the remaining patients has a clonidine prescription but did not reach the blood pressure threshold for clonidine administration. The mean number of doses per patient was 1.8 ± 2.0. Twenty-nine percent of clonidine doses were given when systolic and diastolic blood pressure was below 180 mmHg and 120 mmHg respectively. A total of 25 patients (17%) had a potential adverse reaction following clonidine administration. One patient had a stroke and two patients fell. Sixty-eight patients had evidence of target organ dysfunction related to hypertension prior to clonidine administration. Conclusions Clonidine remains widely prescribed in hospitalized older people. It is possibly due to its rapid onset and little need for dosing adjustment. Clinical interventions should be designed and implanted to reduce its prescription.

The Effect of Bleeding Risk and Frailty Status on Anticoagulation Patterns in Octogenarians With Atrial Fibrillation: The FRAIL-AF Study.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are at increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), its thromboembolic complications, and bleeding. A significant percentage of octogenarians do not receive anticoagulation therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of thromboembolic risk, bleeding risk, and frailty on the anticoagulation status of octogenarians hospitalized with AF. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 682 hospitalized patients aged 80 years and older with AF or atrial flutter in Montreal, Québec. Consumption of warfarin or a new oral anticoagulant was documented. Medical record data were used to determine each patient's frailty status using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and to evaluate the risk of stroke (CHADS2 [Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack]) and bleeding (HAS-BLED [Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio, Elderly (> 65 years) Drugs/alcohol concomitantly]). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the effect of frailty status and the risk of stroke and bleeding on the probability of receiving anticoagulation therapy. RESULTS: Seventy percent of octogenarians with AF received anticoagulation therapy (n = 475). A high risk of stroke (CHADS2 = 3 compared with CHADS2 = 1, odds ratio [OR], 3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-11.77), and the absence of severe frailty (CFS < 7; OR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.84-6.33) were independently associated with anticoagulant use in multivariable analyses. A high risk of bleeding (HAS-BLED score ≥ 3; OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12-0.86) was associated with the absence of anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a higher prevalence of appropriate anticoagulation among octogenarians with AF than reported in previous studies. Further work is needed to develop and disseminate tools to optimize the use of anticoagulants in this high-risk population.